HIIT vs. Sprint Intervals: How to Optimize VO₂max for Endurance Athletes

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂max) is the cornerstone of endurance performance, and two recent studies confirm that aerobic high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to sprint interval training (SIT) in improving VO₂max for both men and women. For endurance coaches and self-educated athletes, these findings offer critical insights into structuring training programs for peak performance.


Key Findings From the Studies

The studies compared three interval training formats in both men and women over eight weeks:

  1. HIIT 4×4 minutes at ~95% maximal aerobic speed (MAS) with 3 minutes of active recovery.
  2. SIT Short Recovery: 8×20 seconds at ~150% MAS with 10 seconds of passive rest.
  3. SIT Long Recovery: 10×30 seconds at ~175% MAS with 3.5 minutes of active recovery.

The results showed that HIIT delivered the greatest improvements in VO₂max, long-distance running performance, and cardiovascular capacity for both sexes:

  • Men: VO₂max increased by 6.5% with HIIT, compared to 3.3% with SIT short recovery and no significant improvement with SIT long recovery.
  • Women: HIIT increased VO₂max by 7.3%, while SIT protocols failed to deliver significant VO₂max gains.

Why HIIT Works Better

  1. Time at High Oxygen Utilization: HIIT enables athletes to sustain workloads at or above 90% VO₂max for longer periods, driving adaptations in oxygen delivery systems such as increased stroke volume and cardiac output.
  2. Lower Injury Risk: In women, SIT at ~175% MAS with long recoveries led to a higher incidence of injuries, including hamstring and calf strains, making HIIT a safer option for structured endurance training.
  3. Superior Aerobic Overload: Sprint intervals emphasize anaerobic metabolism, which is less critical for endurance athletes focusing on sustained performance. HIIT’s aerobic emphasis directly improves the systems most crucial to endurance sports.

Practical Applications for Training

  1. Prioritize HIIT for VO₂max Gains: Incorporate the 4×4-minute HIIT protocol into training, aiming for intensities at ~95% MAS with controlled recoveries.
  2. Use SIT Strategically: Sprint intervals are valuable for enhancing anaerobic capacity and explosive performance but should be secondary to aerobic HIIT in endurance programs.
  3. Monitor Progress with Wearables: Devices like CHASKi can track ventilatory thresholds providing data-driven insights to fine-tune intensity and recovery for individual athletes.
  4. Sex-Specific Considerations: Coaches training female athletes should lean more heavily on HIIT, given its consistent VO₂max benefits and reduced injury risk compared to SIT.

Closing Thoughts

The evidence is clear: if you want to optimize VO₂max and endurance performance, HIIT is the gold standard. Whether coaching seasoned runners or self-educating as an athlete, integrating data-backed protocols like 4×4-minute intervals will maximize results. While SIT has its place, it’s HIIT that delivers the aerobic foundation endurance athletes need to excel.

And since you can’t improve what you don’t measure, start tracking key metrics with CHASKi to take your training to the next level and ensure every session brings you closer to peak performance.

Stay informed, train smart, and empower your athletes to reach their potential!

Sources:

[1] Helgerud, J., Hov, H., Mehus, H., Balto, B., Boye, A., Finsås, L., Hoff, J., & Wang, E. (2023). Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve V̇O2max more than supramaximal sprint intervals in females, similar to males. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports33(11), 2193–2207.

[2] Hov, H., Wang, E., Lim, Y. R., Trane, G., Hemmingsen, M., Hoff, J., & Helgerud, J. (2023). Aerobic high-intensity intervals are superior to improve V̇O2maxcompared with sprint intervals in well-trained men. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports33(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14251